share your thoughtsIs it true that the 2 fishes that Jesus used for feeding 5000 people were a couple of whales?
I can't argue with that logic. I guess I have to believe the story now. Thanks a lot!
Actually, thanks for the laugh. I would have to agree that if bats can be birds, whales can be fish. Makes perfect sense.Is it true that the 2 fishes that Jesus used for feeding 5000 people were a couple of whales?
The two fishes represented 1 earthly nourishment and 2 spiritual nourishment. Having taken both the people were satisfied. The bread was barley bread which is very healthy. The two fishes can also be seen to represent Yin and Yang balance in spirituality. Male/female, good/evil etc. My perception is not of a literal sense but of one which is symbolic.
Not unless the disciples were carrying around 2 whales for dinner in the desert, and were afraid of sharing because there wouldn't be enough. Those must have been 12 hungry men! Not to mention strong! I guess lugging around a whale would make you very hungry. But how did the people miss the fact that these very strong and hungry disciples were concealing two whales under their cloaks? Hmmm
15And when it was evening, his disciples came to him, saying, This is a desert place, and the time is now past; send the multitude away, that they may go into the villages, and buy themselves victuals.
16But Jesus said unto them, They need not depart; give ye them to eat.
17And they say unto him, We have here but five loaves, and two fishes.
18He said, Bring them hither to me.
First of all whales aren't fish they have live babies and they have mammary glands so they are mammals. Not only that but how could he have taken them out of a basket? That would have had to have been one large basket and he wouldn't have been able to break them in half.
Interesting thought, but I don't think so. I think it was supposed to show how miraculous he was. Kind of like how I can take 2 cups of rice, 1 breast of chicken, a can of corn and a bit of mushroom soup and feed 6 people.
If he did I would have protested! Whales are mammals! It is like eating another human being.
Save the whale!
EDIT: WHALES are mammals dear. The Bible is lying!
To everyone who said whale are not fish they obviously didnt know it back then.
In leviticus it is forbidden to eat an innsect with 4 legs
No but a whale was used in the Blowing Blubber Beyond All Believable Bounds news story. If you have never seen it, look it up.
Just imagine how the world would be if instead of loaves he had potatoes and a deep fat fryer.
The question is valid as they could not have known that whales were not fish.
whales are mammals
Well if that's the case the boy that had the two fishes must have been superman.. I would call this question lack of the Bible syndrome.
Whale tastes like chicken.
haha...since when did whales become fish???
whales are not fish, and the bible is so often wrong.
Whales are not fish (They're mamals)
Do not be silly, you know better. Whales are not fish. :)
Whales and bats are mammals dear.
Do you think the small boy who was carrying them could have lifted two whales. If so that would be more of a Miracle then Jesus feeding the 5000 people.
I doubt it...............
can you imagine the basket needed to carry one whale?? lol
Could be.
We know now that they are mammals, yes. Did they, though? I doubt it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment