Did our True God-Man Jesus disappear from ages 12-30 or was the Bible edited by some unspiritual xenophobics ?

In the Christian New Testament Bible, there is no record at all of the Life and Teachings of our Master Jesus Christ from his ages here with us of twelve years old to thirty years old.





Xenophobic is a sick, prejudiced human who fears or hates or is jealous of all other humans from other nations. Compare with chauvinistic or jingoistic or a neo-conservative.





Why? Who did that editing of the Bible? Where did Jesus go?


Did He Teach the Gospel to the Gentiles? Other?





Have you ever prayed to know the truth on this?





Thank you for all sincere answers.





Peace and progress in and with Jesus here in Spirit !


John 16:7-16 Our New Teacher Jesus here in addition to the Holy Spirit and the Spirit of God within us. And all as One Holy Father-Son-Spirit of Truth of the Trinity Government of ALL Reality.Did our True God-Man Jesus disappear from ages 12-30 or was the Bible edited by some unspiritual xenophobics ?
I believe that much ';tinkering'; was done with the Bible. I just can't understand why God's people couldn't know the fullness of what happened to Jesus while he was on this Earth. Much more exposure to the peoples of this world was done by our Lord's son. I believe that whoever was in ';charge'; back in ancient times, wrote and said whatever they wished. There was no ';entity'; that was strong or bold enough to stop these occurrences. I wish you well. Peace, Love and God Bless.Did our True God-Man Jesus disappear from ages 12-30 or was the Bible edited by some unspiritual xenophobics ?
To the extent that these years are ';missing'; from all the Jesus stories, I have always wondered if he traveled to India, which is where he might have acquired most of his ideas of morality - from Buddhists.
I know it is easy to assume that ancient authors followed the same conventions as modern authors when recording biographies, but that is not the case. The Gospels were not intended to be biographies. The early Church maintained a wide collection of individual 'pericopes,' or traditional stories and sayings about Jesus. The goal of each Gospel author was to connect those pericopes into a narrative that conveyed an overall theme. Differences in the presentation of pericopes are due to differences in the theme of the author. Luke, for example, has the disciples remain in Jerusalem after the crucifixion. He did that because the journey to Jerusalem is the theme of his work - he intentionally changed the original pericope (which had the disciples returning to Galilee).
I wouldn't even begin to have an answer on this one. I wish that my dear sweet Grandmother or my dear sweet Mother-in-law were still living and I would ask their opinion on this one. I am sure they would have interesting perspectives on this.
Reading between the lines is the reason why we have so many different offshoots of Christianity.
Since the Bible does not tell us Where Jesus was during that time I would guess that he was growing up as normal person preparing for his role in life. Maybe that Part isn't important to whether someone believes in Him or not. So it wasn't included in the New Testament. Actually it's more important what happened in His life between the ages of 30 and 33 that counts as to someone ability to believe.
We hae commentary galore and still many do not get it. I think we have more than enough information, any more would just lead to more divisions. Many have put it together by direction of the Spirit. That is the only way we will ever understand it. It is, after all, an experience. A 'knowing' rather than an understanding. Understanding comes from the 'knowing' rather than vice versa
Check this webpage to know truth about Jesus. What he claimed, what he taught and how he died? Is Jesus God or God's son? You will find all the answers with 100% accuracy.


http://www.progressive-muslim.org/who-is鈥?/a>
1) Neither. No editing, no disappearance. It simply isn't mentioned. Probably, it is not very important to someone's salvation. Indeed, clearly not all of Jesus' teachings are included in scripture. That would be a *far* more important inclusion than his childhood years. The original authors, rightly, failed to include it.





2) ';Jesus Christ certainly taught His Gospel in other nations, including Greece and Rome and maybe India;';


There is no record of Jesus teaching anywhere other than the Roman provinces of Syria, Judea-Palestina and Peritraea


http://www.bible.ca/maps/maps-ministry-o鈥?/a>


http://intranet.dalton.org/groups/Rome/R鈥?/a>


The bible clearly states that Jesus ministry did not begin until *after* his baptism by John, and he himself states that his mission was only to the Jews.





Jim, http://www.jimpettis.com/wheel/
There's an awful lot of tinkering on this, but not by the ancient authors. The Mormons would like people to believe a lot of hokum about Jesus going off to America among the Indians, a lot of Gnostic revivalists want to sell their bunch of crap about Jesus among the mystics in India, or learning the secrets of the Egyptians, another viewpoint is that held by the proponents of ';British Israel';, chief among them the romantic poet and artist William Blake. The truth is that there are no ';missing years';, the story in Matthew says ';After Herod's death the angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph'; Joseph takes the child and his mother back to Israel, but detours around Judea, settling in Galilee, so we get another prophecy fulfilled, ';He shall be called a Nazarene.'; The story goes directly from there to the baptism account, with Jesus coming from Galilee to John at the Jordan. Nothing remarkable, no separation. Apparently John knows who Jesus is, and why shouldn't he, they're family. Luke has the account of Jesus' Bar Mitzvah in a pilgrimage to Jerusalem at the age of twelve. He ends up teaching at the Temple, while his parents are frantically looking for him for three days, He answers ';Did you not know I must be about my Father's affairs.';, a somewhat cryptic statement and odd choice of time sequence and place. It looks a bit like Luke was not keen on following Mark in saying Jesus ministry began at baptism. Luke says He returned to Nazareth. living under their authority and increasing in wisdom, stature, and favour with God and man. [Your statement leaves out some very IMPORTANT words, ';growing'; and ';And (with) man';. Jesus was divine, but He was also fully human. As a human He was involved in the process of learning and proving His knowledge and understanding of the Jewish faith and tradition. It is only in this manner He could come to be addressed as ';Rabbi';.] For someone who';s ';hidden';, he still seems to be getting a reputation. Mary treasures these things in her heart. The baptism story is told from the perspective of John in prison. Luke doesn't leave out the temptation in the wilderness, but Jesus returns to Galilee, and with a strong reputation begins preaching in synagogues. Briefly Jewish tradition doesn't automatically allow this to someone unknown [They never were very big on know-nothing fundamentalist preachers.]. They know Him in his home town,too. ';This is Joseph's son';. Great for the tourist business! When He doesn't want to set up shop there, they want to stone Him. The ministry is on a roll. John's Gospel is different, he bypasses the temptation in the wilderness, and immediately has Jesus collecting his Galilean disciples from John's, and His miracles with a wedding party he attends with His mom. I'm sorry YOU APPEAR TO BE DOING SOME EDITING!!!! My answers are more sincere than your question.





[Imperial Rome was big on recording any and every religious teaching, cult, and controversy. Post Alexandrian India was heavily bureaucratic, with scribes and secretaries scribbling furiously away. How come there is not a single shred of evidence or record contemporaneous to Jesus' life abut Him teaching in either place? Constantine's reach fell far short of India. Why does Paul have to teach the men on the Areopagus about their ';Unknown God';?]





[The Book of Mormon is not another testament of Jesus Christ, but a fraud written hundreds of years after. It adds nothing but lies.]





[Do you also want to tell us about the ';lost years'; of George Washington between chopping down his father's cherry tree at the age of seven and the time her threw a dollar across the Potomac? or about David Crockett after he killed a bear at age three? or Daniel Boone between settling in Tennessee and fighting at the Alamo beside Crockett? These are parts of our American mythology concerning men known to have lived, but leaving great gaping gaps in the popular history. Maybe some things aren't that important, while others grab people's imagination and let them run wild.]